Introduction
The first diagnosis of your hepatitis C was
probably made due to the result of an (relatively cheap)
anti-body test such as ELISA or similar. The result of this
test was ' positive ', and that means that your body at some
time has come into contact with the hepatitis C virus and that
the immune system of your body developed anti-bodies against
this virus to fight this infection.
In order to find out, whether the virus is
still active in your body, a different test has to be made: The
presence of the virus has to be detected directly.
For this purpose there are two types of
tests available, the qualitative PCR test or a quantitative
test.
The qualitative test can have only
two results: Either the virus is detected, or the virus is not
detected. If the virus is detected (result: positive), you know
only that you do have the virus in your body, but you don't
know, in which quantity it is in your body. If no virus is
detected (result: negative), you know that you either
don't have the virus (any more), or that its concentration is
so low that it cannot be detected.
The quantitative test on the
other hand gives you a number for the...
(I) Viral Load
Your viral load is the amount of viruses
present in a given volume of your blood (usually 1
millilitre = 1 cubic centimeter). More precisely, it means that
the amount of hepC genetic material found in your blood
corresponds to as many hep C viruses as the given number says.
Therefore the given number denotes 'viral equivalents'
(abbreviated: eq ).
The viral load can range from 'not
detected' to hundreds of millions hepC viruses per
milliliter, or up to near a hundred million IUs (International
Units) per milliliter.
(II) What
does "negative"/ "not detectable" mean
?
The meaning of "not detectable" or
"negative" depends on the test used.
The most sensitive test is normally the qualitative
PCR test. In the laboratory, to which I go, the detection limit
for this test is 100 eq/ml. That means that any viral load
below 100eq/ml would give the result
"negative", and any viral load above 100eq/ml would
give the result "positive" . But, in this
qualitative test, 'positive' can mean everything above the
detection limit, 110eq/ml as well as 11,000,000eq/ml - it
doesn't give you a number for the viral load.
The quantitative HCV RNA test via
*PCR* is often somewhat less sensitive - a detection
limit of 200eq/ml in the case of the laboratory, to which
I go. But as the name says: It measures the quantity of viruses
in your blood. It has the advantage to give you a number
for the viral load. - There is also a cheaper *bDNA*
test. But its much less sensitive, with its detection limit
being at approximately 200,000eq/ml.
So, when you are " negative ",
maybe there is no hepatitis C virus in your blood. But maybe
also you do have hepatitis C viruses in your blood, but the
number of viruses is lower than the detection limit of the
test. - In clinical trials, ' negative ' nowadays
normally is defined as less than 100 Eq/ml.
III.)
"Positive" - What's important to note,
besides the pure numbers
When you get back the result of your HCV RNA
quantitative test, and when the lab was able to determine the
amount of virus in your blood, then it is important to write
down not only the number, but also in what units this number is
given.
A) Volume
The volume of blood that the number refers to is
usually one millilitre (ml). But some labs give the
number for 20 microlitres = 1/50 millilitre. So in these cases
you have to multiply the result of the viral load by 50 to get
the number for 1 millilitre.
B) Amount of Virus
Unfortunately, there are several ways to express
the viral load. So, in order to be able to compare
different results, you have to know how to convert these
numbers to some standard format, which I would say is just the
plain number of viruses per millilitre, like 1.5 Million/ml, or
1,500,000/ml.
Thanks to the WHO, we now have another way to express the viral
load, the IU (International Unit).
1.) Viral load given in
IU
Giving the viral load in IU probably soon will replace
all other ways to express the viral load - until recently it
was expressed most frequently in eq or Meq. But at the
moment and in old lab reports a wide variety of ways to give
the viral load still can be found.
The IU = International Unit for the
hepatitis C viral load is a unit more or less arbitrarily
fixed. Labs now can take part in international comparison tests
using a calibrated sample and thereby normalize their results
to an international standard. So, in the future results from
different laboratories should be directly comparable.
For converting numbers from eq to IU and
vice versa, different labs use different conversion factors, in
the range from 2 to 5 viruses per IU. If you do not know the
factor that your lab uses, using a factor of three might be
reasonable. That means: Viral loads given in eq/ml have to be
divided by three to get the viral load in IU/ml. And, viral
loads given in IU/ml have to be multiplied by three to get the
result in eq/ml.
2.) Viral loads given
by virus count
a.) Plain numbers
Often the virus count is expressed as a
plain number, like 1.73 million, or 1,730,000 or 1730000.
Millions sometime are abbreviated by the prefix "M"
(Mega). So when you see 1.73 Meq/ml, it means 1.73
Mega-equivalents/ml or again 1,730,000 equivalents/ml.
Sometimes also the prefix "k" (kilo) is used,
it means thousands.
the following ways to express the viral
load are only rarely seen today:
b.) Exponential format
Large numbers are often expressed in
exponential form, that means a number, multiplied by 10 with an
exponent. To convert this to normal numbers, append as many
zeroes to a "1" as the exponent says, and multiply
this with the number. Exponential numbers might show up in a
form like 1.73x106 or 1.73x10(exp)6 or 1.73x10^6
which are all the same number 1,730,000.
c.) Logarithmic format
Now, recently some people express these
numbers also in logarithmic form (logarithmic transformed
number).
log(1730000)=6.24
6.24 is the logarithmic transformed number
of the viral load of our above example. So, if this
logarithmic number is given to you, you need a calculator
to convert this to a plain number. You have to use the function
10x, where you have to replace x with the
logarithmic number, in the above case 6.24. You
have to calculate 106.24 = 1,730,000 , and here we
have the original number of virus equivalents again.
If you don't have a
calculator, you can estimate the order of magnitude of a viral
load expressed as a logarithmic number. From the logarithmic
number, you take the first digit (to the left of the point )
and add 1 to this number. This gives you the number of digits
that your viral load has (expressed as a plain number).
Example: Logarithmic number 6.24
Left of the point is "6". 6+1 = 7
The number that gives the viral load is 7 digits long, that
means it
is between 1,000,000 and 9,999,999 (digit # 1 234 567).
The next digit ( right of
the point of the logarithmic number ) shows whether you are
high or low in the range.
In case ( but I have never seen that ) you
have a logarithmic number and a blood volume other than 1 ml,
you have to convert the logarithmic number to a plain number
*first*, and then correct it to correspond to 1 ml !
3.) Viral load given by weight
Sometimes, the lab reports the amount of
genetic material found by its weight. 1 pg (pico-gram) of
genetic material corresponds to about 1 million virus
equivalents, so, if your lab result is given in picograms, just
multiply the lab result by 1,000,000, and you have the number
of viruses.
Therefore it is important to have a close
look at your lab report and see in what units the result is
given !
And now, of course, you
would like to know whether your viral load is low or high....
Although there is no general consensus on the
definition of 'low' and 'high' with respect to the viral load,
data from the Web pages of the National
Genetics Institute give you an idea: As can be seen there,
the average viral load is at 3.2 Million eq/ml. - So, to make a
simple scheme I would propose the following classification:
|
Viral Load in eq/ml
|
Classification
|
Remarks
|
|
below 200.000
|
very low
|
below detection limit of bDNA test
|
|
200,000-1,000,000
|
low
|
|
|
1,000,000-5,000,000
|
medium
|
average viral load at 3,200,000 eq/ml
|
|
5,000,000-25,000,000
|
high
|
|
|
above 25,000,000
|
very high
|
|
Expressed in IU, the average viral load is at
1 Million IU/ml. All these classifications of viral load of
course make sense only for patients that are not being treated
against HCV.
Please note: I am no MD. I
am just an informed layperson. What I have learned and written
down here cannot and should not replace the advice from a good
hepatologist! And I have written this in English, which is a
foreign language for me. So beware...
© Albrecht.Ernst |